The team doping directory

Statistics

• 15 years of existence
• 7 cases (64th out of 600 teams) involving 6 team members
• 0,47 cases per year (196th out of 600 teams)

Successive names

Year	Team	Category
1989	Hitachi	0
1988	Hitachi - Bosal - B.C.E. Snooker	0
1987	Hitachi - Marc - Rossin	2
1986	Hitachi - Marc - Splendor	3
1985	Hitachi - Splendor - Sunair	2
1984	Splendor - Mondial Moquette	0
1983	Splendor - Euro Shop	0
1982	Splendor - Wickes Bouwmarkt	0
1981	Splendor - Wickes Bouwmarkt - Europ Decor	0
1980	Splendor - Admiral - TV - Ekspress	0
1979	Splendor - Euro Soap	0
1978	Old Lord's - Splendor	0
1977	Carpenter - Splendor - Zeepcentral	0
1976	Zoppas - Splendor - Sinalco	0
1975	Splendor - Presutti - Notari	0

List of team doping cases

Rider	Product	Race	Year	Penalization	Control
De Vos Hendrik		Course de Blankenberge	1987	Unknown	Positive control
Haex Jozef		Créteil-Chaville	1987	Yes	Positive control
Matthys Rudy		Circuit de la Sarthe	1986	Yes	Positive control
Tourne Stan		Six jours de Bercy	1986	Yes	Police investigation
Wampers Jean-Marie		Gand-Wevelgem	1986	Unknown	Positive control
Criquielion Claude	Pervitin	Championnats de Belgique	1985	No	Positive control
Matthys Rudy		Milan-San Remo	1985	Yes	Positive control

Other doping directories

Disclaimer

For a good understanding, the following should be kept in mind:

• We've done our best to piece together the history of the teams beyond their name changes. This would not have been possible without the considerable work of three websites: www.museociclismo.it, www.memoire-du-cyclisme.eu and www.velorooms.com.
• For each team, this list cannot be exhaustive. Indeed, our doping directory , from which the cases listed here are taken, is by nature incomplete. Moreover, we have not been able to precisely date some doping cases. As a result, these cannot be linked with certainty to such or such a team. They therefore do not appear in this list.
• By doping case, one must understand the positive tests, the reports of deficiency , the disciplinary, parliamentary or judicial inquiries or confessions. When we do not know the outcome, we indicate it in the penalty column. We also mention a number of cases for which there was no sanction. This is the case, for example, of late confessions which did not lead to any prosecution.

If you notice any errors or omissions, please let us know by sending a message here .